osmiva.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #8,024,031
▲ 136,017
- Rank in TLD
- #3,414,309
▲ 51,133
- Referring Domains
- 115
▲ 13
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.9
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 14 yr 0 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 21.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 22.4
- Referring Domains
- 115
- Linked Domains
- 2,262
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 10
10–19 37
20–29 49
30–39 17
40–49 2
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 115
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| aluxurytravelblog.com | 43.1 | #299,406 |
| packslight.com | 41.2 | #404,033 |
| m4mlmsoftware.com | 38.8 | #571,298 |
| theoffbeatlife.com | 36.1 | #824,762 |
| globotreks.com | 35.2 | #954,070 |
| sydneyexpert.com | 34.3 | #1,120,714 |
| missfilatelista.com | 33.0 | #1,404,931 |
| inditales.com | 32.3 | #1,560,223 |
| foodieflashpacker.com | 32.2 | #1,575,262 |
| travelnotesandbeyond.com | 32.0 | #1,614,886 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 20 Oct 2012
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 20 Oct 2027 (349 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- TUCOWS.COM, CO.
Subdomain
shop.osmiva.comwww.osmiva.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | osmiva.com | 84963 | 69.169.108.132 |
| MX | osmiva.com | 86400 | 25 mail.osmiva.com |
| NS | osmiva.com | 86400 | cdns2.interserver.net |
| NS | osmiva.com | 86400 | cdns1.interserver.net |
| NS | osmiva.com | 86400 | cdns3.interserver.net |
| SOA | osmiva.com | 86400 | cdns1.interserver.net. dns.interserver.net. 2026021301 10800 3600 604800 3600 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.