Skip to content

osmarks.net

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.

Domain Power Rank
36.1
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#823,122

▲ 52,352

Rank in TLD
#27,394

▲ 2,171

Referring Domains
292

▲ 28

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
21.5
Subdomains
16
Domain age
5 yr 9 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
wikipedia.org91.8#34
ycombinator.com78.0#705
neocities.org71.5#2,561
xiph.org70.5#3,083
wikidot.com67.7#4,943
lazada.co.th66.3#6,132
lazada.com.ph66.1#6,338
lazada.vn65.8#6,627
lazada.co.id65.1#7,338
hackaday.com64.5#8,103

Basic Information

TLD
.net
Registration date
26 Jan 2021
Last updated
10 Dec 2025
Expires
26 Jan 2031 (1,543 days remaining)
Domain statuses
ok
Registrar
TUCOWS.COM, CO.

Subdomain

a.osmarks.netb.osmarks.netdatasets.osmarks.netdocs.osmarks.netgit.osmarks.nethelloboi.osmarks.nethpage.osmarks.neti.osmarks.netirc.osmarks.netmse.osmarks.netnitter.osmarks.netnooscope.osmarks.netnvo.osmarks.netr.osmarks.netradio-ic.osmarks.netstatus.osmarks.net

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Aosmarks.net60217.155.249.111
AAAAosmarks.net3002a02:8012:ec38:0:d006:22ff:fea9:5223
MXosmarks.net30010 mailserver.purelymail.com
NSosmarks.net86400ns1.mythic-beasts.com
NSosmarks.net86400ns2.mythic-beasts.com
SOAosmarks.net86400ns2.mythic-beasts.com. hostmaster.mythic-beasts.com. 2010270445 21600 7200 604800 3600
TXTosmarks.net300v=spf1 include:_spf.purelymail.com ~all
TXTosmarks.net300google-site-verification=oo-V9_5OSDAt-9VZc5abngvFslK8ZSwZ1JoTohw0ius
TXTosmarks.net300purelymail_ownership_proof=b8e40537e1c0add3f70915cc8f097519ae4ba87ec80d06971b552d37567e557068d74760446a256177771b08cd10e3e7fb08a639714ffeb888e7402cbc24ebf1
CAAosmarks.net36000 issue "letsencrypt.org"

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Valid

DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.