opiq.ee
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #862,214
▲ 90,243
- Rank in TLD
- #813
▲ 101
- Referring Domains
- 100
▼ 15
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 32.2
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- 10 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 32.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 28.9
- Referring Domains
- 100
- Linked Domains
- 246
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 3
10–19 23
20–29 25
30–39 26
40–49 9
50–59 7
60–69 3
70–79 0
80–89 2
90–100 2
Total 100
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| europa.eu | 90.5 | #44 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| pbworks.com | 67.8 | #4,918 |
| err.ee | 64.5 | #8,020 |
| ut.ee | 63.4 | #9,603 |
| e-estonia.com | 56.1 | #35,038 |
| tlu.ee | 55.7 | #37,600 |
| eki.ee | 53.7 | #52,103 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .eeEstonia
- Registration date
- 5 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 23 Aug 2024
- Expires
- 6 Oct 2028 (701 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok (paid and in zone)
- Registry
- Eesti Interneti Sihtasutus (EIS)
- Registrar
- Elkdata OÜ
Subdomain
id.opiq.eeosta.opiq.eevaramu.opiq.eewww.opiq.ee
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | opiq.ee | 1800 | 13.69.68.20 |
| MX | opiq.ee | 1800 | 0 opiq-ee.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | opiq.ee | 60 | ns.elkdata.ee |
| NS | opiq.ee | 60 | ns3.elkdata.net |
| NS | opiq.ee | 60 | ns2.elkdata.ee |
| SOA | opiq.ee | 60 | ns.elkdata.ee. hostmaster.ns.elkdata.ee. 2026032600 10800 1800 604800 60 |
| TXT | opiq.ee | 1800 | MS=ms13062775 |
| TXT | opiq.ee | 1800 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.smaily.com a:o1.ptr7323.opiq.ee ip4:80.235.13.91 -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.