openlb.net
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #110,159
▼ 6,214
- Rank in TLD
- #3,607
▼ 147
- Referring Domains
- 1,887
▼ 169
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.1
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 17 yr 6 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 20.9
- Referring Domains
- 1,887
- Linked Domains
- 8,391
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 220
10–19 680
20–29 304
30–39 152
40–49 310
50–59 162
60–69 30
70–79 21
80–89 6
90–100 2
Total 1,887
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| acm.org | 85.6 | #137 |
| hatena.ne.jp | 82.7 | #270 |
| python.org | 82.0 | #318 |
| plesk.com | 81.2 | #372 |
| statuspage.io | 79.7 | #526 |
| notion.so | 78.3 | #666 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .net
- Registration date
- 16 Apr 2009
- Last updated
- 15 Apr 2026
- Expires
- 16 Apr 2027 (162 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Hetzner Online GmbH
Subdomain
www.openlb.net
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | openlb.net | 7200 | 188.40.28.24 |
| AAAA | openlb.net | 7200 | 2a01:4f8:d0a:120f::2 |
| MX | openlb.net | 7200 | 10 mail.openlb.net |
| NS | openlb.net | 1895 | ns3.second-ns.de |
| NS | openlb.net | 1895 | ns.second-ns.com |
| NS | openlb.net | 1895 | ns1.your-server.de |
| SOA | openlb.net | 7200 | ns1.your-server.de. postmaster.your-server.de. 2026011400 86400 10800 3600000 7200 |
| TXT | openlb.net | 7200 | v=spf1 +a +mx ?all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Warning
This SPF policy uses +all or has no all mechanism. Check whether the sender restrictions are appropriate, and consider ~all or -all if needed.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.