onvif.org
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #69,752
▼ 5,504
- Rank in TLD
- #8,173
▼ 723
- Referring Domains
- 841
▲ 51
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.9
- Subdomains
- 6
- Domain age
- 18 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 21.7
- Referring Domains
- 841
- Linked Domains
- 220
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 137
10–19 224
20–29 199
30–39 120
40–49 78
50–59 41
60–69 18
70–79 18
80–89 4
90–100 2
Total 841
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| microsoft.com | 91.9 | #33 |
| nginx.org | 84.6 | #167 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| pypi.org | 80.3 | #464 |
| mdpi.com | 80.3 | #459 |
| techtarget.com | 79.8 | #518 |
| ycombinator.com | 78.0 | #705 |
| alibaba.com | 77.4 | #783 |
| home-assistant.io | 76.4 | #969 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 29 May 2008
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 29 May 2027 (205 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.
Subdomain
developer.onvif.orghelp.onvif.orghelpold.onvif.orgmembers.onvif.orgstaging.onvif.orgwww.onvif.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | onvif.org | 3600 | 190.92.159.115 |
| MX | onvif.org | 3600 | 8 onvif.org |
| NS | onvif.org | 86400 | ns19092159115.a2dns.com |
| NS | onvif.org | 86400 | ns19092159114.a2dns.com |
| SOA | onvif.org | 86400 | ns19092159114.a2dns.com. root.server.onvif.org. 2026101600 3600 1800 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | onvif.org | 600 | v=spf1 +ip4:190.92.159.114 +ip4:190.92.159.115 +include:spf.inventures.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.