one2crypto.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #3,917,393
▲ 443,881
- Rank in TLD
- #1,641,864
▲ 187,455
- Referring Domains
- 212
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.1
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 1 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 28.2
- Referring Domains
- 212
- Linked Domains
- 1,239
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 3
20–29 161
30–39 47
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 212
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| polymarket.com | 65.2 | #7,310 |
| strongmocha.com | 39.1 | #545,520 |
| cleanerslink.com | 38.7 | #578,685 |
| biographyfinder.com | 35.5 | #916,111 |
| askthebests.com | 35.3 | #933,084 |
| gadgetfee.com | 34.6 | #1,061,330 |
| afterquotes.com | 34.6 | #1,064,865 |
| comfortalife.com | 33.0 | #1,419,508 |
| fatsil.org | 32.7 | #1,478,117 |
| grogreenhouses.com | 32.4 | #1,541,785 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 12 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 13 Jan 2026
- Expires
- 12 Jan 2027 (68 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- RegistryGate GmbH
Subdomain
No Observed Data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | one2crypto.com | 7200 | 85.13.152.79 |
| MX | one2crypto.com | 7200 | 10 w01fd21c.kasserver.com |
| NS | one2crypto.com | 7200 | ns6.kasserver.com |
| NS | one2crypto.com | 7200 | ns5.kasserver.com |
| SOA | one2crypto.com | 7200 | ns5.kasserver.com. hostmaster.kasserver.com. 2607060005 28800 7200 1209600 7200 |
| TXT | one2crypto.com | 7200 | v=spf1 a mx include:spf.kasserver.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.