oflight.co.jp
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #2,040,736
▲ 402,214
- Rank in TLD
- #44,993
▲ 7,730
- Referring Domains
- 67
▲ 8
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.5
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 3 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 19.9
- Referring Domains
- 67
- Linked Domains
- 428
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 11
10–19 23
20–29 17
30–39 7
40–49 3
50–59 3
60–69 2
70–79 0
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 67
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| line.me | 86.9 | #96 |
| itmedia.co.jp | 69.5 | #3,689 |
| emergent.sh | 67.3 | #5,301 |
| levtech.jp | 56.9 | #30,324 |
| smzdm.com | 56.1 | #34,646 |
| freelance-hub.jp | 50.2 | #92,795 |
| explainx.ai | 49.4 | #106,143 |
| spheron.network | 46.5 | #175,453 |
| tilnote.io | 40.9 | #420,241 |
| siuleeboss.com | 35.9 | #846,536 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .jpJapan
- Registration date
- 10 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 31 Jan 2026
- Expires
- 31 Jan 2027 (88 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- Connected (2027/01/31)
- Registry
- Japan Registry Services Co., Ltd.
- Registrar
- VALUE-DOMAIN
Subdomain
www.oflight.co.jp
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | oflight.co.jp | 3600 | 163.44.176.16 |
| AAAA | oflight.co.jp | 3600 | 2400:8500:1301:162::16:1 |
| MX | oflight.co.jp | 3600 | 10 oflight.co.jp |
| NS | oflight.co.jp | 3600 | ns2.value-domain.com |
| NS | oflight.co.jp | 3600 | ns1.value-domain.com |
| SOA | oflight.co.jp | 3600 | ns1.value-domain.com. hostmaster.oflight.co.jp. 2026110504 3600 900 604800 3600 |
| TXT | oflight.co.jp | 3600 | v=spf1 ip4:163.44.176.16 ip6:2400:8500:1301:162::16:1 ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.