ocinside.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #809,044
▲ 19,830
- Rank in TLD
- #35,366
▲ 2,381
- Referring Domains
- 190
▼ 17
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.3
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 25.3
- Referring Domains
- 190
- Linked Domains
- 125
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 30
10–19 37
20–29 43
30–39 30
40–49 28
50–59 15
60–69 5
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 190
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| asus.com | 71.7 | #2,473 |
| follow.it | 69.6 | #3,635 |
| ya.ru | 69.5 | #3,725 |
| makezine.com | 64.6 | #7,915 |
| dbpedia.org | 64.5 | #8,038 |
| ecured.cu | 61.7 | #12,995 |
| newworldencyclopedia.org | 59.5 | #18,994 |
| fogbugz.com | 58.6 | #22,509 |
| wordnik.com | 58.4 | #23,581 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 18 Aug 2018
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
fanshop.ocinside.deseti.ocinside.dewww.seti.ocinside.dewww.ocinside.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | ocinside.de | 3600 | 82.165.192.242 |
| AAAA | ocinside.de | 3600 | 2001:8d8:8bf:be26:2401:b092:9bfe:daff |
| MX | ocinside.de | 3600 | 10 mx01.ionos.de |
| MX | ocinside.de | 3600 | 10 mx00.ionos.de |
| NS | ocinside.de | 172800 | ns1039.ui-dns.com |
| NS | ocinside.de | 172800 | ns1039.ui-dns.org |
| NS | ocinside.de | 172800 | ns1039.ui-dns.de |
| NS | ocinside.de | 172800 | ns1039.ui-dns.biz |
| SOA | ocinside.de | 86400 | ns1039.ui-dns.biz. hostmaster.schlund.de. 2015081513 28800 7200 604800 300 |
| TXT | ocinside.de | 3600 | v=spf1 ip4:82.165.192.75 ip4:82.165.192.242 ip4:87.106.17.164 ip4:87.106.136.116 ip4:82.165.192.237 ip4:87.106.145.233 include:_spf.perfora.net include:_spf-eu.ionos.com include:_spf.kundenserver.de ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.