o-eighty.jp
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #605,915
▲ 51,694
- Rank in TLD
- #16,093
▲ 1,649
- Referring Domains
- 15
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 39.9
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 6 yr 0 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 39.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 34.6
- Referring Domains
- 15
- Linked Domains
- 80
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 4
20–29 2
30–39 4
40–49 1
50–59 0
60–69 2
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 15
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| google.cn | 73.0 | #1,906 |
| excite.co.jp | 64.1 | #8,636 |
| lycbiz.com | 62.5 | #11,130 |
| cultbooking.com | 49.8 | #99,176 |
| cyberhorn.co.jp | 38.6 | #584,777 |
| union-company.jp | 36.0 | #844,393 |
| atlas-log.com | 34.6 | #1,066,762 |
| inno-mark.jp | 32.1 | #1,611,460 |
| metoo.co.jp | 27.3 | #3,411,118 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .jpJapan
- Registration date
- 25 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 31 Oct 2027 (360 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- Active
- Registry
- Japan Registry Services Co., Ltd.
- Registrar
- Onamae.com
Subdomain
www.digitaleyeslab.o-eighty.jp
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | o-eighty.jp | 600 | 118.27.99.213 |
| MX | o-eighty.jp | 600 | 10 mail44.onamae.ne.jp |
| NS | o-eighty.jp | 600 | ns-rs1.gmoserver.jp |
| NS | o-eighty.jp | 600 | ns-rs2.gmoserver.jp |
| SOA | o-eighty.jp | 86400 | ns-rs1.gmoserver.jp. hostmaster.o-eighty.jp. 2021031206 28800 7200 604800 600 |
| TXT | o-eighty.jp | 600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.onamae.ne.jp ~all |
| TXT | o-eighty.jp | 600 | google-site-verification=Yu_f-b6GlL-G3h8LJ2Tbf3bP5YMYv3q8S8BKNQsv0dA |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.