nw.ru
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #94,526
▼ 18,376
- Rank in TLD
- #1,315
▼ 181
- Referring Domains
- 1,075
▼ 52
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 32.5
- Subdomains
- 147
- Domain age
- 29 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 32.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 29.7
- Referring Domains
- 1,075
- Linked Domains
- 2,959
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 86
10–19 228
20–29 228
30–39 194
40–49 146
50–59 96
60–69 61
70–79 22
80–89 12
90–100 2
Total 1,075
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| europa.eu | 90.5 | #44 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| doi.org | 86.2 | #117 |
| bund.de | 85.4 | #144 |
| wikimedia.org | 85.2 | #150 |
| mit.edu | 83.2 | #238 |
| mail.ru | 83.1 | #245 |
| nature.com | 83.1 | #251 |
| weforum.org | 81.2 | #374 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ruRussia
- Registration date
- 28 Nov 1996
- Expires
- 30 Nov 2026 (25 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- REGISTERED DELEGATED VERIFIED
- Registry
- Coordination Center for TLD RU
- Registrar
- RU-CENTER-RU
Subdomain
aari.nw.ruwww.ipyeaso.aari.nw.rusouth.aari.nw.ruwww.aari.nw.ruacademy.nw.ruadop.nw.ruwww.alumni-spbu.nw.ruarcheo.nw.ruwww.archeo.nw.ruarctica.nw.ruarzhan2.nw.ruwww.arzhan2.nw.ruwww.atom.nw.rubiospace.nw.rudatadiver.nw.rudl.nw.ruwww.dl99.nw.rudsc.nw.ruwww.eco.nw.ruwww.ecolog.nw.ru
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | nw.ru | 86400 | 82.179.39.21 |
| MX | nw.ru | 3600 | 5 mail.nw.ru |
| MX | nw.ru | 3600 | 10 relay4.nw.ru |
| NS | nw.ru | 86400 | ns.runnet.ru |
| NS | nw.ru | 86400 | ns2.runnet.ru |
| SOA | nw.ru | 86400 | ns.runnet.ru. hostmaster.runnet.ru. 2026091701 3600 1200 10368000 86400 |
| TXT | nw.ru | 86400 | v=spf1 mx -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.