ntpc.edu.tw
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #71,928
▼ 4,803
- Rank in TLD
- #249
▼ 29
- Referring Domains
- 1,763
▼ 53
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.7
- Subdomains
- 923
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 19.6
- Referring Domains
- 1,763
- Linked Domains
- 2,601
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 276
10–19 628
20–29 389
30–39 177
40–49 156
50–59 95
60–69 28
70–79 7
80–89 3
90–100 4
Total 1,763
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| apple.com | 93.5 | #22 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| line.me | 86.9 | #96 |
| frontiersin.org | 80.3 | #465 |
| usc.edu | 76.6 | #937 |
| telegra.ph | 72.9 | #1,958 |
| reurl.cc | 71.6 | #2,538 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .twTaiwan
Subdomain
105cefa.ntpc.edu.tw12basic.ntpc.edu.tw1know.ntpc.edu.twwww.aaia.ntpc.edu.twacomwifi.ntpc.edu.twadobe.ntpc.edu.twilearning.akhs.ntpc.edu.twilearning2.akhs.ntpc.edu.twweb.akhs.ntpc.edu.twwww.akhs.ntpc.edu.twclass2.anhoes.ntpc.edu.twserver02.anhoes.ntpc.edu.twwww.anhoes.ntpc.edu.twwww.aodi.ntpc.edu.twwww1.aodi.ntpc.edu.twappgo.ntpc.edu.twapps.ntpc.edu.twart.ntpc.edu.twwww.ases.ntpc.edu.twwww.asjh.ntpc.edu.tw
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| MX | ntpc.edu.tw | 600 | 10 mg1.ntpc.edu.tw |
| MX | ntpc.edu.tw | 600 | 10 mg2.ntpc.edu.tw |
| NS | ntpc.edu.tw | 86400 | dns6.ntpc.edu.tw |
| NS | ntpc.edu.tw | 86400 | dns5.ntpc.edu.tw |
| SOA | ntpc.edu.tw | 600 | dns6.ntpc.edu.tw. admin.ntpc.edu.tw. 2026110301 300 150 691200 3600 |
| TXT | ntpc.edu.tw | 600 | v=spf1 ip4:163.28.3.6 ip4:163.28.3.7 ip6:2001:288:2200:112::6 ip6:2001:288:2200:112::7 ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.