nr.no
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #212,372
▼ 73,333
- Rank in TLD
- #645
▼ 261
- Referring Domains
- 228
▼ 8
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 40.3
- Subdomains
- 47
- Domain age
- 26 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 40.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 37.1
- Referring Domains
- 228
- Linked Domains
- 467
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 8
10–19 28
20–29 45
30–39 40
40–49 35
50–59 27
60–69 29
70–79 10
80–89 3
90–100 3
Total 228
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| europa.eu | 90.5 | #44 |
| w3.org | 88.8 | #62 |
| mdpi.com | 80.3 | #459 |
| frontiersin.org | 80.3 | #465 |
| buzzsprout.com | 78.4 | #662 |
| washington.edu | 77.0 | #868 |
| ucl.ac.uk | 74.7 | #1,365 |
| lse.ac.uk | 74.6 | #1,376 |
Basic Information
Subdomain
alert.nr.noasset.nr.noasset-internal.nr.nobark.nr.nobestapps.nr.noblog.nr.nocleanup.nr.nocyballiance.nr.nodeeplearning.nr.nodigiright.nr.noearthobs.nr.noeclim.nr.noem.nr.noeuroclim.nr.noexplego.nr.nofiles.nr.nogeostats2012.nr.nographdial.nr.nohbr2.nr.nohelmersol.nr.no
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | nr.no | 300 | 167.172.171.226 |
| MX | nr.no | 3600 | 10 nr-no.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | nr.no | 172800 | ns1-01.azure-dns.com |
| NS | nr.no | 172800 | ns2-01.azure-dns.net |
| NS | nr.no | 172800 | ns3-01.azure-dns.org |
| NS | nr.no | 172800 | ns4-01.azure-dns.info |
| SOA | nr.no | 3600 | ns1-01.azure-dns.com. azuredns-hostmaster.microsoft.com. 1 3600 300 2419200 300 |
| TXT | nr.no | 3600 | v=spf1 ip4:156.116.6.41 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all |
| TXT | nr.no | 3600 | HARICA-1Qekx0c1gcfQwDqbBcE |
| TXT | nr.no | 3600 | HARICA-koNSAJLLNgfUGDS7ncI |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.