norrageducation.org
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #252,150
▲ 72,282
- Rank in TLD
- #28,952
▲ 7,785
- Referring Domains
- 81
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 44.3
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 1 yr 6 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 44.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 42.7
- Referring Domains
- 81
- Linked Domains
- 1,557
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 9
20–29 14
30–39 9
40–49 13
50–59 15
60–69 8
70–79 7
80–89 4
90–100 0
Total 81
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| columbia.edu | 85.2 | #151 |
| linktr.ee | 84.7 | #161 |
| stanford.edu | 83.3 | #237 |
| admin.ch | 81.4 | #361 |
| ox.ac.uk | 78.9 | #601 |
| cam.ac.uk | 76.9 | #871 |
| brookings.edu | 76.6 | #930 |
| ubc.ca | 74.2 | #1,493 |
| hrw.org | 73.4 | #1,789 |
| ed.ac.uk | 72.6 | #2,065 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 9 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 20 Nov 2025
- Expires
- 9 Apr 2030 (1,252 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- Key-Systems GmbH
Subdomain
resources.norrageducation.orgwww.norrageducation.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | norrageducation.org | 300 | 84.16.66.247 |
| AAAA | norrageducation.org | 300 | 2001:1600:13:102:f816:3eff:fe58:5415 |
| MX | norrageducation.org | 3600 | 5 mta-gw.infomaniak.ch |
| NS | norrageducation.org | 3600 | ns11.infomaniak.ch |
| NS | norrageducation.org | 3600 | ns12.infomaniak.ch |
| SOA | norrageducation.org | 3600 | ns11.infomaniak.ch. hostmaster.infomaniak.ch. 2025043479 10800 3600 605800 3600 |
| TXT | norrageducation.org | 3600 | v=spf1 include:spf.infomaniak.ch -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.