noav.sk
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,545,231
▼ 172,463
- Rank in TLD
- #2,506
▼ 266
- Referring Domains
- 229
▼ 34
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 33.0
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 9 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 33.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 29.0
- Referring Domains
- 229
- Linked Domains
- 1,347
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 6
10–19 74
20–29 35
30–39 10
40–49 70
50–59 29
60–69 2
70–79 2
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 229
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| acm.org | 85.6 | #137 |
| telegra.ph | 72.9 | #1,958 |
| hashnode.com | 70.0 | #3,361 |
| servethehome.com | 62.9 | #10,414 |
| rentry.co | 61.6 | #13,095 |
| divephotoguide.com | 59.2 | #20,132 |
| pastelink.net | 58.6 | #22,768 |
| dibiz.com | 58.2 | #24,194 |
| anotepad.com | 58.1 | #24,568 |
| phacility.com | 57.5 | #27,601 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .skSlovakia
- Registration date
- 7 Sept 2017
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- SK-NIC, a.s.
- Registrar
- EXOT-0004
Subdomain
No data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | noav.sk | 3600 | 92.240.253.107 |
| MX | noav.sk | 3600 | 10 relay.exohosting.sk |
| MX | noav.sk | 3600 | 10 relay1.exohosting.sk |
| MX | noav.sk | 3600 | 15 relay3.dnsserver.eu |
| MX | noav.sk | 3600 | 20 relay2.dnsserver.eu |
| NS | noav.sk | 3600 | ns.exohosting.sk |
| NS | noav.sk | 3600 | ns1.exohosting.eu |
| NS | noav.sk | 3600 | ns3.exohosting.cz |
| SOA | noav.sk | 3600 | ns.exohosting.sk. ns.exohosting.sk. 1678842925 10800 1800 604800 3600 |
| TXT | noav.sk | 3600 | v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.dnsserver.eu ?all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Warning
This SPF policy uses +all or has no all mechanism. Check whether the sender restrictions are appropriate, and consider ~all or -all if needed.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.