nnamm.com
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low.
- Global Rank
- #10,695,924
▲ 1,607,047
- Rank in TLD
- #4,599,419
▲ 686,234
- Referring Domains
- 29
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 22.6
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 22 yr 0 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 22.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 17.7
- Referring Domains
- 29
- Linked Domains
- 293
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 5
10–19 13
20–29 5
30–39 2
40–49 2
50–59 1
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 29
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| doorkeeper.jp | 64.2 | #8,546 |
| u-ryukyu.ac.jp | 54.3 | #46,782 |
| ttcbn.net | 46.1 | #186,538 |
| mono96.jp | 40.9 | #418,478 |
| torounit.com | 39.4 | #526,400 |
| site-builder.wiki | 39.3 | #530,301 |
| anahideo.com | 27.8 | #3,197,887 |
| roguer.info | 27.6 | #3,289,162 |
| koto1.com | 25.6 | #4,352,198 |
| neppie.com | 21.9 | #7,261,478 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 28 Oct 2004
- Last updated
- 27 Sept 2026
- Expires
- 28 Oct 2027 (357 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.com
Subdomain
No Observed Data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | nnamm.com | 3600 | 118.27.125.158 |
| MX | nnamm.com | 3600 | 50 mx01.lolipop.jp |
| NS | nnamm.com | 3600 | dns01.muumuu-domain.com |
| NS | nnamm.com | 3600 | dns02.muumuu-domain.com |
| SOA | nnamm.com | 3600 | dns01.muumuu-domain.com. postmaster.nnamm.com. 1789226925 3600 1800 604800 3600 |
| TXT | nnamm.com | 3600 | google-site-verification=3imfnbuFT-u71lkwikCpydyZl3XjMEFGDWyVxOGLHOg |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.