ng.mil
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #47,811
▲ 3,764
- Rank in TLD
- #32
▲ 1
- Referring Domains
- 1,536
▲ 46
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.4
- Subdomains
- 89
- Domain age
- —
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 34.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 32.7
- Referring Domains
- 1,536
- Linked Domains
- 573
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 122
10–19 281
20–29 291
30–39 247
40–49 269
50–59 178
60–69 77
70–79 61
80–89 8
90–100 2
Total 1,536
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| outlook.com | 86.2 | #119 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| ca.gov | 83.6 | #211 |
| nist.gov | 82.9 | #261 |
| iheart.com | 81.0 | #389 |
| cbsnews.com | 80.9 | #405 |
| marriott.com | 80.6 | #426 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .mil
No data
Subdomain
co2.admin.ng.milak.ng.milal.ng.milwww.al.ng.milarng.ng.milarngonline.ng.milcampedwards.ng.milchaplain.ng.milco.ng.milwww.co.ng.milct.ng.mildc.ng.milde.ng.milwww.de.ng.mileaats.ng.milwww.education.ng.milfederation.ng.milfl.ng.milwww.fl.ng.milftig.ng.mil
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| NS | ng.mil | 857 | ns01.army.mil |
| NS | ng.mil | 857 | ns02.army.mil |
| NS | ng.mil | 857 | ns03.army.mil |
| SOA | ng.mil | 2766 | ns01.army.mil. usarmy\.huachuca\.netcom\.mesg\.epdns-global.army.mil. 1169399 900 90 2419200 300 |
| TXT | ng.mil | 2758 | v=spf1 -all |
| TXT | ng.mil | 2758 | apple-domain-verification=RnlVUUCc2uQVJDDvxIZyGlo4ZNKnYC6leHvwFzGZtrc |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- SPF
- Sending prohibited
This SPF policy states that no server is authorized to send email for the domain (-all only).
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.