Skip to content

netspar.nl

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.

Domain Power Rank
45.5
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#206,089

▲ 6,036

Rank in TLD
#2,213

▼ 15

Referring Domains
219

▲ 12

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
38.3
Subdomains
3
Domain age
22 yr 8 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
google.com99.8#1
weebly.com87.4#85
nih.gov87.1#91
constantcontact.com80.6#429
hhs.gov80.3#468
frontiersin.org80.3#465
upenn.edu78.7#620
hku.hk78.2#683
asu.edu74.1#1,528
sfu.ca73.6#1,699

Basic Information

Registration date
6 Feb 2004
Last updated
22 Nov 2025
Domain statuses
active
Registrar
Katholieke Universiteit Brabant

Subdomain

reporting.netspar.nl2023.reporting.netspar.nlwww.netspar.nl

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Anetspar.nl300162.159.136.54
Anetspar.nl300162.159.137.54
MXnetspar.nl36000 netspar-nl.mail.protection.outlook.com
NSnetspar.nl3600ns1.uvt.nl
NSnetspar.nl3600ns2.uvt.nl
SOAnetspar.nl3600ns1.uvt.nl. hostmaster.uvt.nl. 2026110500 28800 14400 604800 300
TXTnetspar.nl3600MS=ms54391257
TXTnetspar.nl3600Tilburg University
TXTnetspar.nl3600phone: +31-13-4669111
TXTnetspar.nl3600Universiteit van Tilburg
TXTnetspar.nl3600Warandelaan 2, Tilburg, The Netherlands
TXTnetspar.nl3600P.O.box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
TXTnetspar.nl3600v=spf1 a mx include:_spfdc.uvt.nl include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.loyals.nl include:_spf.elasticemail.com -all
CAAnetspar.nl36000 iodef "mailto:ssl@uvt.nl"
CAAnetspar.nl36000 issue "amazon.com"
CAAnetspar.nl36000 issue "digicert.com"
CAAnetspar.nl36000 issue "harica.gr"
CAAnetspar.nl36000 issue "letsencrypt.org"
CAAnetspar.nl36000 issue "pki.goog"
CAAnetspar.nl36000 issue "sectigo.com"

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Valid

DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.