Skip to content

nepad.org

Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.

Domain Power Rank
54.1
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#48,687

▲ 6,626

Rank in TLD
#5,669

▲ 741

Referring Domains
1,276

▲ 36

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
34.3
Subdomains
17
Domain age
24 yr 11 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
microsoft.com91.9#33
wikipedia.org91.8#34
europa.eu90.5#44
mozilla.org89.8#52
nih.gov87.1#91
columbia.edu85.2#151
substack.com84.4#173
tinyurl.com84.1#186
un.org83.5#222
stanford.edu83.3#237

Basic Information

TLD
.org
Registration date
7 Nov 2001
Last updated
12 Aug 2026
Expires
7 Nov 2026 (2 days remaining)
Registrar
Mesh Digital Limited

Subdomain

agsp.nepad.orgaid.nepad.orgamrh.nepad.orgwww.amrh.nepad.orgatlas.nepad.orgau.nepad.orgcaadp.nepad.orgcitizenengagement.nepad.orgdocs.citizenengagement.nepad.orgportal.citizenengagement.nepad.orgcmpmwanga.nepad.orgcsa2017.nepad.orge-recruitment.nepad.orggeospatial.nepad.orgmsmeacademy.nepad.orgwww.nepad.orgwww.www.nepad.org

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Anepad.org36003.33.251.168
Anepad.org360015.197.225.128
MXnepad.org60010 mx1-eu.emailsecurity.app
MXnepad.org60020 mx2-eu.emailsecurity.app
NSnepad.org3600ns67.domaincontrol.com
NSnepad.org3600ns68.domaincontrol.com
SOAnepad.org3600ns67.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2026102701 28800 7200 604800 600
TXTnepad.org600kdh5kp790sc84v18hftni8tct3
TXTnepad.org600v=spf1 ip4:203.123.85.13 ip4:105.27.205.202 include:spf.scanscope.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-eu.emailsignatures365.com include:spf1.emailsecurity.app include:spf.mandrillapp.com -all
TXTnepad.org6003llnsqevs3mjalf2o8vq50gmmg
TXTnepad.org600gqpmjtale3qkt0s1p0p6a4ap0f

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.