Skip to content

naha.org

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from a broad range of domains appear in the observed data.

Domain Power Rank
48.6
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#121,695

▲ 4,163

Rank in TLD
#14,194

▲ 145

Referring Domains
1,120

▲ 56

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
23.5
Subdomains
5
Domain age
29 yr 8 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
shopify.com92.5#28
wikipedia.org91.8#34
bit.ly88.4#67
nih.gov87.1#91
plos.org78.8#607
entrepreneur.com78.3#670
umn.edu76.7#913
va.gov76.6#934
illinois.edu76.2#1,008
cancer.gov74.3#1,480

Basic Information

TLD
.org
Registration date
13 Feb 1997
Last updated
12 Aug 2026
Expires
14 Feb 2028 (466 days remaining)
Registrar
GoDaddy.com, LLC

Subdomain

conference.naha.orgconferencestaging.naha.orgmail.naha.orgnew.naha.orgwww.naha.org

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Anaha.org300172.67.211.110
Anaha.org300104.21.77.197
AAAAnaha.org3002606:4700:3037::ac43:d36e
AAAAnaha.org3002606:4700:3032::6815:4dc5
MXnaha.org3000 naha-org.mail.protection.outlook.com
MXnaha.org3001 smtp.google.com
NSnaha.org86400jaziel.ns.cloudflare.com
NSnaha.org86400laylah.ns.cloudflare.com
SOAnaha.org1800jaziel.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2418521686 10000 2400 604800 1800
TXTnaha.org3002pvjj4hage56cm373jqqcc7krg
TXTnaha.org30054in3ebogdrro1o1bvte73ib80
TXTnaha.org300MS=ms64493898
TXTnaha.org300anthropic-domain-verification-dyh94h=siyUPlz16Oacx13C9Tp0vLAVk
TXTnaha.org300e07qga3ejm7gug9qknbq31305d
TXTnaha.org300google-site-verification=0hOHdBvLqMbzuiCOQavwtOTJzK5DM8vfevreTIBuZ6A
TXTnaha.org300v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:sendgrid.net -all

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.