nafi.ru
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #70,572
▲ 5,631
- Rank in TLD
- #917
▲ 218
- Referring Domains
- 850
▼ 16
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 31.3
- Subdomains
- 6
- Domain age
- 18 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 31.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 31.2
- Referring Domains
- 850
- Linked Domains
- 273
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 115
10–19 124
20–29 163
30–39 174
40–49 137
50–59 89
60–69 28
70–79 13
80–89 4
90–100 3
Total 850
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| yandex.ru | 90.3 | #47 |
| t.me | 90.0 | #50 |
| tinyurl.com | 84.1 | #186 |
| mail.ru | 83.1 | #245 |
| googleblog.com | 80.8 | #413 |
| mdpi.com | 80.3 | #459 |
| yandex.com | 79.2 | #568 |
| reg.ru | 79.1 | #578 |
| rambler.ru | 76.3 | #991 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ruRussia
- Registration date
- 21 Jan 2008
- Expires
- 21 Jan 2027 (77 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- REGISTERED DELEGATED VERIFIED
- Registry
- Coordination Center for TLD RU
- Registrar
- REGRU-RU
Subdomain
download.nafi.ruhealth.nafi.runew.nafi.rupartner.nafi.rustaffhealth.nafi.ruwww.nafi.ru
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | nafi.ru | 3600 | 31.31.197.64 |
| MX | nafi.ru | 3600 | 0 mail.nafi.ru |
| NS | nafi.ru | 3600 | ns1.reg.ru |
| NS | nafi.ru | 3600 | ns2.reg.ru |
| SOA | nafi.ru | 3600 | ns1.reg.ru. hostmaster.ns1.reg.ru. 1790860646 14400 3600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | nafi.ru | 3600 | MS=ms84301805 |
| TXT | nafi.ru | 3600 | google-site-verification=01fdnjNcBBoWtyAzAI61YEyEhqh5Rf6e9Fjx4ZlyrBw |
| TXT | nafi.ru | 3600 | v=spf1 a:mail.nafi.ru ip4:194.87.232.79 ip4:176.113.83.168 include:spf.sendsay.ru -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.