nafer.org
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #2,447,770
▲ 1,092,585
- Rank in TLD
- #220,282
▲ 75,869
- Referring Domains
- 33
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.1
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 14 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 27.4
- Referring Domains
- 33
- Linked Domains
- 204
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 4
10–19 8
20–29 7
30–39 5
40–49 6
50–59 3
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 33
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| reedsmith.com | 57.8 | #26,141 |
| gtlaw.com | 57.4 | #27,840 |
| connectedcommunity.org | 54.7 | #44,290 |
| tomba.io | 49.6 | #102,733 |
| cozen.com | 49.2 | #110,977 |
| expertfile.com | 48.8 | #118,544 |
| axosbank.com | 48.3 | #129,188 |
| rotd.com | 44.2 | #251,498 |
| buchalter.com | 44.2 | #253,079 |
| douglaswilson.com | 37.9 | #644,760 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 13 Sept 2012
- Last updated
- 28 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 13 Sept 2027 (313 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientRenewProhibited clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- Wild West Domains, LLC
Subdomain
member.nafer.orgwww.nafer.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | nafer.org | 3600 | 35.227.68.247 |
| MX | nafer.org | 3600 | 0 nafer-org.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | nafer.org | 3600 | ns22.domaincontrol.com |
| NS | nafer.org | 3600 | ns21.domaincontrol.com |
| SOA | nafer.org | 3600 | ns21.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2026092803 28800 7200 604800 3600 |
| TXT | nafer.org | 3600 | v=verifydomain MS=1924558 |
| TXT | nafer.org | 3600 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all |
| TXT | nafer.org | 3600 | v=spf1 mx include:spf.ymem.net ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Configuration error
Multiple SPF records were found. Only one SPF policy should be published.
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.