myranggo.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #24,169,160
▲ 2,368,997
- Rank in TLD
- #10,622,825
▲ 1,040,432
- Referring Domains
- 7
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 20.4
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 7 yr 7 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 20.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 15.5
- Referring Domains
- 7
- Linked Domains
- 240
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 3
20–29 2
30–39 0
40–49 1
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 7
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| technobaboy.com | 41.8 | #369,230 |
| walastech.com | 27.7 | #3,246,918 |
| techandlifestylejournal.com | 22.2 | #6,973,898 |
| futurestays.ai | 15.5 | #18,527,291 |
| therainbowstar.net | 15.0 | #19,971,300 |
| sinaunangpanahon.com | 14.5 | #21,237,432 |
| helenatanacio.com | 6.0 | #72,734,161 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 27 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 1 Apr 2026
- Expires
- 27 Mar 2027 (142 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientRenewProhibited clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GoDaddy.com, LLC
Subdomain
consultancy.myranggo.comwww.myranggo.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | myranggo.com | 1800 | 72.167.227.180 |
| MX | myranggo.com | 3600 | 0 smtp.secureserver.net |
| MX | myranggo.com | 3600 | 10 mailstore1.secureserver.net |
| NS | myranggo.com | 3600 | ns63.domaincontrol.com |
| NS | myranggo.com | 3600 | ns64.domaincontrol.com |
| SOA | myranggo.com | 600 | ns63.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2026041400 28800 7200 604800 600 |
| TXT | myranggo.com | 3600 | v=spf1 include:secureserver.net -all |
| TXT | myranggo.com | 3600 | firebase=my-ranggo |
| TXT | myranggo.com | 3600 | D2787906 |
| TXT | myranggo.com | 3600 | google-site-verification=heiNAz6FAkPlv2BBTXn29qsA3Z8kpEttOib9iIA7eCA |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.