muddiskochen.de
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #3,535,940
▲ 112,023
- Rank in TLD
- #171,106
▲ 9,762
- Referring Domains
- 21
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.2
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 28.0
- Referring Domains
- 21
- Linked Domains
- 57
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 3
20–29 8
30–39 5
40–49 1
50–59 0
60–69 2
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 21
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| vodafone.de | 64.0 | #8,778 |
| nwzonline.de | 61.6 | #13,058 |
| gutekueche.at | 48.7 | #119,922 |
| reishunger.de | 39.8 | #492,710 |
| nwzmedien.de | 38.7 | #579,834 |
| tastesheriff.com | 37.5 | #675,211 |
| adnord.de | 34.5 | #1,074,842 |
| molkerei-ruecker.de | 30.3 | #2,110,793 |
| vonortzuort.reisen | 28.9 | #2,641,035 |
| frauenboulevard.de | 28.4 | #2,889,095 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2026
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
www.muddiskochen.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | muddiskochen.de | 3600 | 85.13.138.46 |
| MX | muddiskochen.de | 3600 | 10 mx3.medien-systempartner.de |
| MX | muddiskochen.de | 3600 | 10 mx4.medien-systempartner.de |
| NS | muddiskochen.de | 3600 | secondary006.dtag.net |
| NS | muddiskochen.de | 3600 | ns0.niedersachsen.com |
| NS | muddiskochen.de | 3600 | pns.dtag.de |
| SOA | muddiskochen.de | 3600 | ns0.niedersachsen.com. dns.gutenberg-rz.de. 2026102340 14400 3600 1814400 3600 |
| TXT | muddiskochen.de | 3600 | MS=ms46278391 |
| TXT | muddiskochen.de | 3600 | v=spf1 ip4:80.228.115.225 ip4:80.228.115.226 ip4:185.175.196.67 ip4:185.175.197.110 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.