mtc.edu
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #545,291
▼ 298,886
- Rank in TLD
- #2,914
▼ 856
- Referring Domains
- 380
▼ 24
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 22.0
- Subdomains
- 10
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 22.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 18.5
- Referring Domains
- 380
- Linked Domains
- 255
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 87
10–19 125
20–29 87
30–39 30
40–49 20
50–59 23
60–69 3
70–79 3
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 380
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| squarespace.com | 90.3 | #46 |
| wpengine.com | 82.5 | #285 |
| givebutter.com | 76.1 | #1,022 |
| osu.edu | 73.3 | #1,803 |
| collegeboard.org | 71.6 | #2,507 |
| payscale.com | 69.1 | #4,033 |
| memberclicks.net | 67.2 | #5,354 |
| apta.org | 63.3 | #9,805 |
| clarku.edu | 59.0 | #20,957 |
| archiveteam.org | 57.9 | #25,818 |
Basic Information
Subdomain
apply.mtc.educareertraining.mtc.educontinue.mtc.eduhelp.mtc.eduinfo.mtc.edumyweb.mtc.eduoa.mtc.eduvisit.mtc.eduwebapps.mtc.eduwww.mtc.edu
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | mtc.edu | 86400 | 162.144.42.141 |
| MX | mtc.edu | 86400 | 5 mtc-edu.mail.eo.outlook.com |
| NS | mtc.edu | 86400 | ns2.oar.net |
| NS | mtc.edu | 86400 | ns1.oar.net |
| SOA | mtc.edu | 86400 | ns0.oar.net. hostmaster.oar.net. 2026021800 3600 1800 10800 10800 |
| TXT | mtc.edu | 86400 | MS=ms66415938 |
| TXT | mtc.edu | 86400 | apple-domain-verification=myfM2iRwNvkGgsnn |
| TXT | mtc.edu | 86400 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com a:smtp02.mtc.edu mx:mtc.edu -all |
| TXT | mtc.edu | 86400 | jhW1HpNS2Dt+06DWe/8ed+oNq9Z9piMdvezfXhEimHJW3/JFQGEOrfZ3bfRbgJha4cfwulUuoUYspHVKE3LD1Q== |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.