moritzdunkel.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #502,461
▼ 20,506
- Rank in TLD
- #22,438
▼ 105
- Referring Domains
- 160
▼ 13
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.0
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 19.9
- Referring Domains
- 160
- Linked Domains
- 440
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 21
10–19 60
20–29 31
30–39 25
40–49 16
50–59 2
60–69 1
70–79 3
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 160
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| free.fr | 78.2 | #681 |
| provenexpert.com | 74.5 | #1,406 |
| awwwards.com | 70.3 | #3,156 |
| heise-regioconcept.de | 60.0 | #17,394 |
| page-online.de | 56.3 | #33,604 |
| dasauge.de | 54.5 | #45,505 |
| foxyform.de | 49.4 | #106,397 |
| designers-inn.de | 48.5 | #123,539 |
| haie.de | 48.1 | #132,486 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 23 Aug 2007
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
www.moritzdunkel.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | moritzdunkel.de | 150 | 81.169.145.79 |
| AAAA | moritzdunkel.de | 150 | 2a01:238:20a:202:1079:: |
| MX | moritzdunkel.de | 150 | 5 smtpin.rzone.de |
| NS | moritzdunkel.de | 150 | shades18.rzone.de |
| NS | moritzdunkel.de | 150 | docks05.rzone.de |
| SOA | moritzdunkel.de | 150 | docks05.rzone.de. hostmaster.strato-rz.de. 2020051934 86400 7200 604800 300 |
| TXT | moritzdunkel.de | 150 | v=spf1 redirect=_spf.strato.com |
| TXT | moritzdunkel.de | 150 | openai-domain-verification=dv-yPyBwaZ75kN9EDr0znPkMPvt |
| TXT | moritzdunkel.de | 150 | google-site-verification=HtB_93nyxhvqVUhXvnY9dIGw17PZm9RUEPA0ihagHD4 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.