mobilecomm.ru
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #624,301
▼ 55,648
- Rank in TLD
- #10,998
▼ 329
- Referring Domains
- 192
▼ 27
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.1
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 27 yr 7 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 20.9
- Referring Domains
- 192
- Linked Domains
- 259
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 40
10–19 51
20–29 33
30–39 30
40–49 18
50–59 7
60–69 9
70–79 3
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 192
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| mail.ru | 83.1 | #245 |
| narod.ru | 71.8 | #2,456 |
| kommersant.ru | 70.4 | #3,124 |
| sas.com | 70.2 | #3,236 |
| therecord.media | 69.0 | #4,092 |
| timeweb.com | 67.3 | #5,322 |
| vedomosti.ru | 67.0 | #5,513 |
| msu.ru | 64.7 | #7,840 |
| cctld.ru | 63.4 | #9,657 |
| avaya.com | 63.3 | #9,764 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ruRussia
- Registration date
- 30 Mar 1999
- Expires
- 31 Mar 2027 (146 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- REGISTERED DELEGATED UNVERIFIED
- Registry
- Coordination Center for TLD RU
- Registrar
- TIMEWEB-RU
Subdomain
www.mobilecomm.ru
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | mobilecomm.ru | 600 | 92.53.96.117 |
| MX | mobilecomm.ru | 600 | 10 mx1.timeweb.ru |
| MX | mobilecomm.ru | 600 | 20 mx2.timeweb.ru |
| NS | mobilecomm.ru | 600 | ns4.timeweb.org |
| NS | mobilecomm.ru | 600 | ns2.timeweb.ru |
| NS | mobilecomm.ru | 600 | ns3.timeweb.org |
| NS | mobilecomm.ru | 600 | ns1.timeweb.ru |
| SOA | mobilecomm.ru | 600 | ns1.timeweb.ru. dns.timeweb.ru. 2025022601 28800 7200 259200 300 |
| TXT | mobilecomm.ru | 600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.timeweb.ru ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.