Skip to content

minalogic.com

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.

Domain Power Rank
43.8
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#267,611

▼ 9,924

Rank in TLD
#112,046

▼ 4,570

Referring Domains
361

▲ 2

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
31.3
Subdomains
2
Domain age
21 yr 5 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
europa.eu90.5#44
hpe.com73.1#1,858
cnrs.fr71.9#2,383
csis.org70.4#3,123
francetravail.fr68.2#4,574
canalblog.com67.4#5,232
sciencesconf.org65.5#6,918
francenum.gouv.fr64.9#7,530
auvergnerhonealpes.fr64.6#7,880
prlog.org64.1#8,631

Basic Information

TLD
.com
Registration date
16 May 2005
Last updated
14 Oct 2026
Expires
16 May 2027 (192 days remaining)
Registrar
GANDI SAS

Subdomain

wam.minalogic.comwww.minalogic.com

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Aminalogic.com300145.239.37.162
MXminalogic.com20005 mx-mibc-fr-06.mailinblack.com
NSminalogic.com10800ns-184-a.gandi.net
NSminalogic.com10800ns-105-c.gandi.net
NSminalogic.com10800ns-121-b.gandi.net
SOAminalogic.com10800ns1.gandi.net. hostmaster.gandi.net. 1793836800 10800 3600 604800 10800
TXTminalogic.com10800brevo-code:a8d78981b4c6cca40d02503b1d0b22ec
TXTminalogic.com10800google-site-verification=hwbf4vtpqJ33vjAVk2PQvSc2TzmzFqhsg9vdMxYZhkc
TXTminalogic.com10800v=spf1 ip4:145.239.37.162 ip4:94.127.10.141 ip4:193.48.18.153 ip4:172.246.24.121 ip4:149.72.203.251 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.mailinblack.com include:spf.matchmaking-studio.com include:spf.mailjet.com include:spf.brevo.com ~all
TXTminalogic.com10800brevo-code:d78466c94d19f651b62164ac0005b2a5

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.