midosapo.com
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low. This domain was registered at least 10 years ago. Only a small number of referring domains were found in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #51,918,913
▼ 11,488,950
- Rank in TLD
- #23,847,211
▼ 5,560,565
- Referring Domains
- 6
▼ 4
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 13.7
- Subdomains
- 9
- Domain age
- 10 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 13.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 12.7
- Referring Domains
- 6
- Linked Domains
- 2,139
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 3
10–19 2
20–29 1
30–39 0
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 6
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| hopsuk.cz | 25.2 | #4,652,839 |
| studio-kasho.com | 16.5 | #16,210,904 |
| narita-dc.com | 15.9 | #17,609,480 |
| sabaerealestateconsulting.com | 9.4 | #43,918,293 |
| miyakooh.com | 9.2 | #45,312,372 |
| miraikikan.sblo.jp | 5.9 | #74,410,055 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 8 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 22 Nov 2025
- Expires
- 8 Jan 2027 (64 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Japan Registry Services Co.,Ltd.(JPRS)
Subdomain
h1.midosapo.comh2.midosapo.comh4.midosapo.comh7.midosapo.comh8.midosapo.comkoho.midosapo.commmj.midosapo.comn4.midosapo.comwww.midosapo.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | midosapo.com | 3600 | 219.94.163.66 |
| MX | midosapo.com | 3600 | 10 midosapo.com |
| NS | midosapo.com | 3600 | ns1.dns.ne.jp |
| NS | midosapo.com | 3600 | ns2.dns.ne.jp |
| SOA | midosapo.com | 3600 | master.dns.ne.jp. tech.sakura.ad.jp. 2016010908 3600 900 3600000 3600 |
| TXT | midosapo.com | 3600 | v=spf1 a:www1456.sakura.ne.jp mx ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.