meta2.fr
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low.
- Global Rank
- #2,407,622
▲ 3,904,792
- Rank in TLD
- #35,058
▲ 71,924
- Referring Domains
- 17
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 33.3
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 17 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 33.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 27.2
- Referring Domains
- 17
- Linked Domains
- 56
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 2
20–29 8
30–39 2
40–49 3
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 17
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| list-manage.com | 86.7 | #103 |
| matadornetwork.com | 57.8 | #26,013 |
| lafriche.org | 48.4 | #127,485 |
| madeinmarseille.net | 46.6 | #171,332 |
| marcelle.media | 40.3 | #459,541 |
| chateauephemere.org | 32.2 | #1,581,639 |
| caap.asso.fr | 31.9 | #1,639,071 |
| federationdelarturbain.org | 29.1 | #2,581,246 |
| vezzoni-associes.com | 27.2 | #3,485,927 |
| legrandbain-ecole.fr | 26.3 | #3,934,316 |
Basic Information
Subdomain
www.meta2.fr
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | meta2.fr | 3600 | 146.59.209.152 |
| AAAA | meta2.fr | 3600 | 2001:41d0:301::31 |
| MX | meta2.fr | 3600 | 1 mx1.mail.ovh.net |
| MX | meta2.fr | 3600 | 5 mx2.mail.ovh.net |
| MX | meta2.fr | 3600 | 100 mx3.mail.ovh.net |
| NS | meta2.fr | 3600 | ns107.ovh.net |
| NS | meta2.fr | 3600 | dns107.ovh.net |
| SOA | meta2.fr | 3600 | dns107.ovh.net. tech.ovh.net. 2092377195 86400 3600 3600000 300 |
| TXT | meta2.fr | 3600 | 1|www.meta2.fr |
| TXT | meta2.fr | 3600 | v=spf1 include:mx.ovh.com ~all |
| TXT | meta2.fr | 3600 | google-site-verification=ojxXqn3XA9mIhhApm-yBjTxmhHDoG-u0bYib1GbNCgc |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.