menteacima.com
This relatively new domain has few observed referring domains and a low Domain Power Rank.
- Global Rank
- #96,787,448
▼ 160,906
- Rank in TLD
- #46,221,920
▼ 371,788
- Referring Domains
- 2
–
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 12.7
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 1 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 12.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 12.7
- Referring Domains
- 2
- Linked Domains
- 93
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 2
20–29 0
30–39 0
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 2
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| smartstimer.com | 13.1 | #25,707,433 |
| canadapsilocybin.com | 12.2 | #29,410,424 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 8 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2026
- Expires
- 8 Jan 2027 (64 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- HOSTINGER operations, UAB
Subdomain
blog.menteacima.comleia.menteacima.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | menteacima.com | 60 | 145.223.124.3 |
| A | menteacima.com | 60 | 147.79.79.193 |
| AAAA | menteacima.com | 60 | 2a02:4780:84:94b:46fd:ad46:5a16:ff41 |
| AAAA | menteacima.com | 60 | 2a02:4780:84:ac8:6472:cc10:a9df:d425 |
| MX | menteacima.com | 14400 | 10 mx2.hostinger.com |
| MX | menteacima.com | 14400 | 5 mx1.hostinger.com |
| NS | menteacima.com | 86400 | ns2.dns-parking.com |
| NS | menteacima.com | 86400 | ns1.dns-parking.com |
| SOA | menteacima.com | 3600 | ns1.dns-parking.com. dns.hostinger.com. 2026110501 10000 2400 604800 600 |
| TXT | menteacima.com | 3600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.mail.hostinger.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.