materiality.pl
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #4,849,214
▼ 260,723
- Rank in TLD
- #48,346
▼ 1,706
- Referring Domains
- 8
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.4
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- 10 yr 0 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 22.0
- Referring Domains
- 8
- Linked Domains
- 163
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 2
20–29 2
30–39 1
40–49 1
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 8
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| efrag.org | 59.6 | #18,661 |
| polenergia.pl | 43.3 | #292,020 |
| materialityacademy.com | 38.5 | #593,981 |
| esrs.pl | 22.5 | #6,684,917 |
| czasnaesg.pl | 21.4 | #7,824,904 |
| ulice.ai | 14.5 | #21,262,061 |
| icsrg.org | 11.2 | #33,576,734 |
| findepconsult.com | 8.1 | #52,766,537 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .plPoland
- Registration date
- 26 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 26 Oct 2027 (355 days remaining)
- Registrar
- LH.pl Sp. z o.o.
Subdomain
en.materiality.plesrsreports.materiality.plomnibus.materiality.plpl.materiality.pl
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | materiality.pl | 3600 | 195.2.223.119 |
| MX | materiality.pl | 3600 | 0 materiality-pl.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | materiality.pl | 3600 | ns2.lighthosting.net |
| NS | materiality.pl | 3600 | ns.lh.pl |
| SOA | materiality.pl | 3600 | ns.lh.pl. root.lh.pl. 2008052701 1200 600 604800 86400 |
| TXT | materiality.pl | 3600 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.lh.pl ~all |
| TXT | materiality.pl | 3600 | facebook-domain-verification=kl2mfj8fajvy92s5bidstp6m053spe |
| TXT | materiality.pl | 3600 | google-site-verification=JkR1sw1HtrP-iSTB2YE3egYG5-yIuU7oniwzEqQ6f50 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.