lodyssee-du-papillon.voyage
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #9,079,300
▲ 1,384,084
- Rank in TLD
- #58
▲ 6
- Referring Domains
- 16
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.4
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 23.9
- Referring Domains
- 16
- Linked Domains
- 4
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 3
20–29 8
30–39 2
40–49 2
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 16
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| cbi.eu | 52.0 | #69,059 |
| lonelyplanet.fr | 48.5 | #123,681 |
| openjaw.com | 40.0 | #484,461 |
| ibcpcfrance2026.com | 39.8 | #498,477 |
| neobienetre.fr | 34.8 | #1,021,767 |
| futourisme.eu | 29.3 | #2,500,357 |
| lafarelesoliviers.com | 26.5 | #3,844,574 |
| lemondeenrendezvous.com | 24.0 | #5,496,168 |
| tourismelab.fr | 23.7 | #5,691,425 |
| pilat-patrimoines.fr | 22.8 | #6,446,319 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .voyage
No registration data could be retrieved.
Subdomain
www.lodyssee-du-papillon.voyage
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | lodyssee-du-papillon.voyage | 900 | 51.91.166.246 |
| MX | lodyssee-du-papillon.voyage | 900 | 10 mail-fr.securemail.pro |
| NS | lodyssee-du-papillon.voyage | 900 | ns2.amenworld.com |
| NS | lodyssee-du-papillon.voyage | 900 | ns1.amenworld.com |
| SOA | lodyssee-du-papillon.voyage | 900 | ns1.amenworld.com. root.amen.fr. 2026012901 86400 7200 2592000 300 |
| TXT | lodyssee-du-papillon.voyage | 900 | facebook-domain-verification=covul08il4shlfvh3ufo7qkctvy5bf |
| TXT | lodyssee-du-papillon.voyage | 900 | v=spf1 include:spf.webapps.net ip4:217.160.0.233 ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Configuration error
There is a problem with the DMARC configuration. Multiple DMARC records were found, making the policy invalid.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.