lltjournal.org
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #237,912
▲ 9,679
- Rank in TLD
- #27,245
▲ 744
- Referring Domains
- 209
▲ 9
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 38.7
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 12 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 38.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 36.7
- Referring Domains
- 209
- Linked Domains
- 135
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 22
10–19 31
20–29 26
30–39 33
40–49 29
50–59 29
60–69 18
70–79 13
80–89 6
90–100 2
Total 209
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| stanford.edu | 83.3 | #237 |
| mit.edu | 83.2 | #238 |
| berkeley.edu | 80.7 | #415 |
| frontiersin.org | 80.3 | #465 |
| cmu.edu | 79.4 | #555 |
| hku.hk | 78.2 | #683 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 20 May 2014
- Last updated
- 20 Apr 2026
- Expires
- 20 May 2027 (196 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- NAMECHEAP INC
Subdomain
www.lltjournal.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | lltjournal.org | 1799 | 128.171.129.109 |
| MX | lltjournal.org | 1800 | 10 eforward1.registrar-servers.com |
| MX | lltjournal.org | 1800 | 10 eforward2.registrar-servers.com |
| MX | lltjournal.org | 1800 | 10 eforward3.registrar-servers.com |
| MX | lltjournal.org | 1800 | 15 eforward4.registrar-servers.com |
| MX | lltjournal.org | 1800 | 20 eforward5.registrar-servers.com |
| NS | lltjournal.org | 1800 | dns1.registrar-servers.com |
| NS | lltjournal.org | 1800 | dns2.registrar-servers.com |
| SOA | lltjournal.org | 3601 | dns1.registrar-servers.com. hostmaster.registrar-servers.com. 1757534807 43200 3600 604800 3601 |
| TXT | lltjournal.org | 1800 | v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.