linux.by
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #3,705,312
▼ 104,556
- Rank in TLD
- #3,309
▲ 164
- Referring Domains
- 37
–
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 41.5
- Subdomains
- 19
- Domain age
- 0 yr 7 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 41.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 37.0
- Referring Domains
- 37
- Linked Domains
- 463
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 2
20–29 11
30–39 4
40–49 4
50–59 7
60–69 2
70–79 4
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 37
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| fedoraproject.org | 75.3 | #1,198 |
| narod.ru | 71.8 | #2,456 |
| lwn.net | 71.0 | #2,790 |
| wikibooks.org | 70.9 | #2,888 |
| cocolog-nifty.com | 66.1 | #6,323 |
| lib.ru | 60.3 | #16,483 |
| openvz.org | 56.7 | #31,792 |
| linux.org.ru | 54.8 | #42,969 |
| altlinux.org | 54.4 | #46,357 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .byBelarus
- Registration date
- 11 Mar 2026
- Expires
- 11 Mar 2028 (492 days remaining)
- Registry
- Belarusian Cloud Technologies LLC
- Registrar
- Reliable Software, Ltd
Subdomain
edu.linux.byforum.linux.bygomel.linux.byi18n.linux.byjava.linux.byldp.linux.bymlug.linux.bymogilev.linux.bywww.mogilev.linux.byns.linux.byorsha.linux.bypolotsk.linux.byrost.linux.bywww.ruby.linux.bysimple.linux.byslavutichlug.linux.byuser.linux.bywiki.linux.bywww.linux.by
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | linux.by | 3600 | 31.130.205.132 |
| NS | linux.by | 3600 | ns2.linux.by |
| NS | linux.by | 3600 | ns.linux.by |
| SOA | linux.by | 3600 | main.linux.by. root.linux.by. 2025121601 28800 7200 604800 86400 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.