linclip.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #685,096
▼ 159,091
- Rank in TLD
- #281,109
▼ 66,791
- Referring Domains
- 257
▼ 20
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 18.3
- Subdomains
- 5
- Domain age
- 16 yr 4 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 18.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 15.9
- Referring Domains
- 257
- Linked Domains
- 879
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 60
10–19 110
20–29 55
30–39 21
40–49 5
50–59 2
60–69 2
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 257
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| microsoft.com | 91.9 | #33 |
| blog.jp | 71.0 | #2,805 |
| seesaa.net | 69.2 | #3,907 |
| allabout.co.jp | 61.7 | #12,885 |
| mama-hack.com | 57.7 | #26,655 |
| pia.co.jp | 55.0 | #41,535 |
| ooco.jp | 47.9 | #137,970 |
| protopedia.net | 46.9 | #162,490 |
| kawai-global.com | 45.5 | #203,982 |
| dtmstation.com | 43.8 | #271,204 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 1 Jul 2010
- Last updated
- 1 Jun 2026
- Expires
- 1 Jul 2027 (238 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Key-Systems GmbH
Subdomain
newbodyfresher.linclip.comnts.linclip.compointofviewpoint.linclip.comsen.linclip.comsticky.linclip.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | linclip.com | 1200 | 202.172.25.45 |
| MX | linclip.com | 1200 | 10 linclip.com |
| NS | linclip.com | 1200 | ns2.value-domain.com |
| NS | linclip.com | 1200 | ns1.value-domain.com |
| SOA | linclip.com | 1200 | ns1.value-domain.com. hostmaster.linclip.com. 2024031115 3600 900 604800 1200 |
| TXT | linclip.com | 1200 | v=spf1 ip4:202.172.25.45 include:mxr.valueserver.jp ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.