levanga.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #258,736
▼ 15,064
- Rank in TLD
- #108,434
▼ 6,703
- Referring Domains
- 341
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.7
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 15 yr 2 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 23.9
- Referring Domains
- 341
- Linked Domains
- 675
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 49
10–19 92
20–29 76
30–39 58
40–49 34
50–59 19
60–69 7
70–79 4
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 341
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| yahoo.co.jp | 81.5 | #348 |
| yimg.jp | 73.4 | #1,749 |
| amebaownd.com | 72.7 | #2,034 |
| eplus.jp | 72.1 | #2,283 |
| jal.co.jp | 70.1 | #3,324 |
| seesaa.net | 69.2 | #3,907 |
| pepabo.com | 68.0 | #4,768 |
| l-tike.com | 66.5 | #5,982 |
| hokkaido.lg.jp | 64.0 | #8,735 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 6 Aug 2011
- Last updated
- 4 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 6 Aug 2027 (274 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.com
Subdomain
www.levanga.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | levanga.com | 300 | 46.51.244.145 |
| MX | levanga.com | 300 | 10 mail.levanga.com |
| NS | levanga.com | 172800 | ns-1179.awsdns-19.org |
| NS | levanga.com | 172800 | ns-1755.awsdns-27.co.uk |
| NS | levanga.com | 172800 | ns-220.awsdns-27.com |
| NS | levanga.com | 172800 | ns-911.awsdns-49.net |
| SOA | levanga.com | 900 | ns-1755.awsdns-27.co.uk. awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com. 1 7200 900 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | levanga.com | 300 | v=spf1 +ip4:46.51.250.243/32 +ip4:133.242.23.134 ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.