leoclinic.net
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #36,923,941
▲ 2,346,936
- Rank in TLD
- #1,130,629
▲ 82,095
- Referring Domains
- 44
▲ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 17.1
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 5 yr 6 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 17.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 14.2
- Referring Domains
- 44
- Linked Domains
- 4,081
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 6
10–19 26
20–29 9
30–39 2
40–49 1
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 44
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| ssru.ac.th | 49.6 | #103,951 |
| klimstudio.com | 37.3 | #691,092 |
| vildastamps.com | 32.0 | #1,634,066 |
| arcticdirectory.com | 27.8 | #3,206,504 |
| preparationmentale.fr | 27.1 | #3,536,349 |
| davelampole.be | 26.8 | #3,693,556 |
| preafitness.co.uk | 24.2 | #5,358,391 |
| epopculture.com | 22.5 | #6,644,652 |
| ownmycareer.com | 22.4 | #6,769,341 |
| rufv-rheine-catenhorn.de | 22.4 | #6,807,349 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .net
- Registration date
- 27 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 13 Mar 2026
- Expires
- 27 Apr 2027 (174 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com
Subdomain
No data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | leoclinic.net | 300 | 14.207.142.14 |
| MX | leoclinic.net | 300 | 10 mail.leoclinic.net |
| NS | leoclinic.net | 300 | ns1.leoclinic.net |
| NS | leoclinic.net | 300 | ns2.leoclinic.net |
| SOA | leoclinic.net | 300 | ns1.leoclinic.net. postmaster.leoclinic.net. 2026042201 10800 3600 1209600 10800 |
| TXT | leoclinic.net | 300 | v=spf1 +a +mx +a:thsv54.hostatom.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.