leftor.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #103,289
▲ 55,307
- Rank in TLD
- #45,128
▲ 22,006
- Referring Domains
- 266
▼ 16
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 15.0
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 18 yr 10 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 15.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 13.0
- Referring Domains
- 266
- Linked Domains
- 31
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 103
10–19 93
20–29 50
30–39 7
40–49 11
50–59 0
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 266
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| cpanel.net | 86.3 | #114 |
| softaculous.com | 62.7 | #10,868 |
| kontactr.com | 49.3 | #109,345 |
| co.ba | 49.0 | #114,139 |
| rcast.net | 48.6 | #123,030 |
| whtop.com | 48.1 | #131,928 |
| publicradiofan.com | 47.5 | #146,458 |
| mojweb.ba | 44.5 | #239,616 |
| untz.ba | 43.7 | #273,581 |
| media.ba | 43.4 | #287,134 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 14 Dec 2007
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2026
- Expires
- 14 Dec 2029 (1,135 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- ENOM, INC.
Subdomain
www.podrska.leftor.comstream.leftor.comwww.leftor.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | leftor.com | 14400 | 209.162.200.15 |
| MX | leftor.com | 8521 | 0 leftor.com |
| NS | leftor.com | 86400 | dns4.fakat.net |
| NS | leftor.com | 86400 | dns.fakat.net |
| NS | leftor.com | 86400 | dns3.fakat.net |
| NS | leftor.com | 86400 | dns2.fakat.net |
| SOA | leftor.com | 80521 | dns.fakat.net. amir.leftor.com. 2026102800 3600 1800 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | leftor.com | 14400 | v=spf1 ip4:209.162.200.15 +a +mx ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.