lef.li
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #17,188,923
▼ 10,422,768
- Rank in TLD
- #2,886
▼ 1,681
- Referring Domains
- 113
▼ 18
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.6
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 19 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 26.4
- Referring Domains
- 113
- Linked Domains
- 736
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 34
20–29 56
30–39 19
40–49 2
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 113
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| lemmy.world | 50.2 | #93,710 |
| lemmy.ml | 47.6 | #144,008 |
| diggita.com | 42.1 | #349,929 |
| theatl.social | 36.1 | #824,731 |
| infosec.pub | 35.8 | #872,032 |
| jlai.lu | 33.6 | #1,254,686 |
| mrp.net | 33.5 | #1,263,590 |
| gayfr.online | 33.3 | #1,347,250 |
| harding.dev | 32.7 | #1,463,813 |
| bosio.info | 32.2 | #1,573,090 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .liLiechtenstein
- Registration date
- 20 May 2007
- Domain statuses
- active
Subdomain
No Observed Data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | lef.li | 3600 | 130.61.220.194 |
| AAAA | lef.li | 3600 | 2603:c020:8008:33ff:dead:beef:bad:c0de |
| MX | lef.li | 3600 | 10 mail.lef.li |
| MX | lef.li | 3600 | 50 mxe881.netcup.net |
| NS | lef.li | 3600 | dns112.ovh.net |
| NS | lef.li | 3600 | ns112.ovh.net |
| SOA | lef.li | 3600 | dns112.ovh.net. tech.ovh.net. 2024060200 86400 3600 3600000 60 |
| TXT | lef.li | 3600 | google-site-verification=rfbTWBDD4-LI7d9gpgaZ0cMMVKWT6H_ZvJsB0z9cznI |
| TXT | lef.li | 3600 | v=spf1 mx a include:_spf.webhosting.systems ~all |
| CAA | lef.li | 3600 | 0 issue "letsencrypt.org" |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.