laballade.de
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low. Only a small number of referring domains were found in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #8,534,058
▼ 141,626
- Rank in TLD
- #474,693
▼ 1,989
- Referring Domains
- 13
–
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.9
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 21.7
- Referring Domains
- 13
- Linked Domains
- 129
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 3
20–29 5
30–39 2
40–49 2
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 13
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| hessen.social | 44.2 | #254,745 |
| buecherfrauen.de | 42.4 | #334,523 |
| wir-erschaffen-welten.net | 36.6 | #766,125 |
| annaheger.de | 32.1 | #1,601,879 |
| tintenzirkel.de | 27.9 | #3,120,695 |
| hopelit.de | 23.5 | #5,877,989 |
| phantastopia.de | 21.7 | #7,527,001 |
| textgefaehrtin.de | 20.9 | #8,384,496 |
| reginamars.de | 20.2 | #9,369,607 |
| independentbookworm.de | 17.3 | #14,581,727 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 3 Mar 2023
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
www.laballade.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | laballade.de | 7200 | 212.8.207.7 |
| AAAA | laballade.de | 7200 | 2001:ae2:207::2:eb:8 |
| MX | laballade.de | 7200 | 9 mx1.greensta.de |
| MX | laballade.de | 7200 | 11 mx2.greensta.de |
| NS | laballade.de | 7200 | ns1.teuto.net |
| NS | laballade.de | 7200 | ns2.teuto.net |
| NS | laballade.de | 7200 | ns3.teuto.net |
| SOA | laballade.de | 7200 | ns1.teuto.net. hostmaster.teuto.net. 2026110402 28000 7200 604800 86400 |
| TXT | laballade.de | 7200 | v=spf1 include:spf.greensta.de ~all |
| CAA | laballade.de | 7200 | 0 issue "letsencrypt.org" |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.