Skip to content

kstyle.com

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.

Domain Power Rank
43.2
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#295,597

▼ 6,269

Rank in TLD
#123,364

▼ 3,289

Referring Domains
910

▼ 25

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
16.7
Subdomains
6
Domain age
24 yr 10 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
wikipedia.org91.8#34
hatena.ne.jp82.7#270
rakuten.co.jp80.6#427
ameblo.jp80.3#460
uol.com.br77.2#817
prtimes.jp77.1#841
exblog.jp73.8#1,603
livedoor.jp72.6#2,091
blog.jp71.0#2,805
xsrv.jp71.0#2,829

Basic Information

TLD
.com
Registration date
16 Dec 2001
Last updated
17 Dec 2025
Expires
16 Dec 2026 (41 days remaining)
Registrar
Japan Registry Services Co.,Ltd.(JPRS)

Subdomain

jalenrosegolfclassic.comwww.kstyle.commv.kstyle.comnews.kstyle.compr.kstyle.comstatic.kstyle.comwww.kstyle.com

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Akstyle.com60108.156.172.57
Akstyle.com60108.156.172.21
Akstyle.com60108.156.172.5
Akstyle.com60108.156.172.68
NSkstyle.com172800ns-1063.awsdns-04.org
NSkstyle.com172800ns-1621.awsdns-10.co.uk
NSkstyle.com172800ns-206.awsdns-25.com
NSkstyle.com172800ns-907.awsdns-49.net
SOAkstyle.com900ns-1621.awsdns-10.co.uk. awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com. 1 7200 900 1209600 86400
TXTkstyle.com600_globalsign-domain-verification=Tg6yOuYU0O74DpnKy16SP1y_PvoN7BytSVsSbl-Bwl
TXTkstyle.com600google-site-verification=LaiiCnnh5EJ4-3WzOdcPBqUu6R_TvGraQxi-AV3mfKU
TXTkstyle.com600google-site-verification=OF08Nq9uMvOFNAqWZU4JQ-NyipqIuo_RE3HnXnJiDv8
TXTkstyle.com600google-site-verification=qtM00RISQAZlPTGD3NDNRHJGtT_mbiEd3CwIEkeeyDE

Email Authentication

MX
Warning

No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.

SPF
Not configured

No matching DNS record was found.

DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.