krisesenter.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #684,964
▼ 179,499
- Rank in TLD
- #281,057
▼ 74,950
- Referring Domains
- 194
▲ 4
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.6
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 25 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 22.2
- Referring Domains
- 194
- Linked Domains
- 93
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 18
10–19 58
20–29 48
30–39 31
40–49 27
50–59 8
60–69 1
70–79 2
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 194
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| gov.ro | 71.8 | #2,413 |
| wikisource.org | 70.1 | #3,331 |
| emb-japan.go.jp | 66.1 | #6,301 |
| politiet.no | 55.9 | #36,134 |
| nmbu.no | 54.9 | #42,406 |
| mfa.gov.lv | 54.4 | #46,540 |
| azurecontainerapps.io | 54.3 | #46,883 |
| bufdir.no | 54.2 | #47,874 |
| ung.no | 53.3 | #55,816 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 22 Nov 2000
- Last updated
- 23 Nov 2025
- Expires
- 22 Nov 2026 (17 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- OK
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Ascio Technologies, Inc
Subdomain
www.krisesenter.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | krisesenter.com | 600 | 176.9.31.8 |
| MX | krisesenter.com | 600 | 0 krisesenter-com.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | krisesenter.com | 3600 | ns.datacenter.no |
| NS | krisesenter.com | 3600 | ns2.datacenter.no |
| SOA | krisesenter.com | 3600 | ns.datacenter.no. hostmaster.krisesenter.com. 1747667336 16384 2048 1048576 2560 |
| TXT | krisesenter.com | 600 | v=spf1 ip4:195.159.144.141 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all |
| TXT | krisesenter.com | 600 | MS=ms73524879 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.