Skip to content

kmi.re.kr

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.

Domain Power Rank
40.9
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#422,665

▼ 50,785

Rank in TLD
#1,990

▼ 225

Referring Domains
181

▼ 7

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
29.8
Subdomains
5
Domain age
29 yr 4 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
wikipedia.org91.8#34
outlook.com86.2#119
substack.com84.4#173
mdpi.com80.3#459
frontiersin.org80.3#465
fao.org76.5#946
imo.org66.9#5,618
snu.ac.kr65.8#6,621
dal.ca65.3#7,174
belfercenter.org64.0#8,805

Basic Information

Registration date
4 Jul 1997
Last updated
10 Dec 2025
Expires
15 Oct 2027 (344 days remaining)
Registrar
Inames Co., Ltd.(http://www.inames.co.kr)

Subdomain

fta.kmi.re.krlibrary.kmi.re.krlmail.kmi.re.krscm-briefing.kmi.re.krwww.kmi.re.kr

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Akmi.re.kr900118.129.184.2
MXkmi.re.kr90010 library.kmi.re.kr
MXkmi.re.kr90032767 5975D01976FCB1EBF6EED8537FDC18FD513C4C74.msv1.invalid
MXkmi.re.kr9005 zmx124.mailplug.com
NSkmi.re.kr900ns2.dacom.co.kr
NSkmi.re.kr900ocean.kmi.re.kr
SOAkmi.re.kr900kmi.re.kr. admin.kmi.re.kr. 237 10800 3600 2419200 3600
TXTkmi.re.kr900mailer.domain.verification=L7s1XT0A9jFQ2aDJ5jfmghkx6R7dHL
TXTkmi.re.kr900google-site-verification=v8ws96AN-nH_pB-L2HDpnn38mSTVYZwezqsln2LjpOc
TXTkmi.re.kr900v=spf1 ip4:118.129.184.200 ip4:14.63.222.172 ip4:118.129.184.201 ip4:118.129.184.202 ip4:118.129.184.2 ip4:118.129.184.144 ip4:118.129.184.75 ip4:118.129.184.90 ip4:118.129.184.168 ip4:118.129.184.42 ip4:27.96.154.84 mx include:mailplug.com include:email.gov-ncloud.com ~all
TXTkmi.re.kr900MS=5975D01976FCB1EBF6EED8537FDC18FD513C4C74

Email Authentication

MX
Warning

A mail server hostname could not be resolved to an IP address.

SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.