kiap.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. This domain has few referring domains.
- Global Rank
- #1,676,550
▲ 133,250
- Rank in TLD
- #700,959
▲ 43,316
- Referring Domains
- 25
–
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.9
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 24 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 32.2
- Referring Domains
- 25
- Linked Domains
- 243
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 7
20–29 2
30–39 8
40–49 0
50–59 1
60–69 4
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 25
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| t.me | 90.0 | #50 |
| wolterskluwer.com | 72.8 | #1,981 |
| ya.ru | 69.5 | #3,725 |
| vedomosti.ru | 67.0 | #5,513 |
| hse.ru | 65.8 | #6,588 |
| fide.com | 60.9 | #14,919 |
| pravo.by | 59.6 | #18,755 |
| iccwbo.ru | 39.6 | #512,883 |
| arbitration.ru | 36.3 | #800,388 |
| arbitrations.ru | 36.0 | #840,404 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 16 Nov 2001
- Last updated
- 17 Sept 2026
- Expires
- 16 Nov 2027 (376 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Regional Network Information Center, JSC dba RU-CENTER
Subdomain
www.kiap.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | kiap.com | 600 | 92.53.96.199 |
| MX | kiap.com | 600 | 10 mx.yandex.net |
| NS | kiap.com | 600 | ns3.timeweb.org |
| NS | kiap.com | 600 | ns1.timeweb.ru |
| NS | kiap.com | 600 | ns2.timeweb.ru |
| NS | kiap.com | 600 | ns4.timeweb.org |
| SOA | kiap.com | 600 | ns1.timeweb.ru. dns.timeweb.ru. 21052045 28800 7200 259200 300 |
| TXT | kiap.com | 600 | yandex-verification: 3b4e2d15e80d2d0c |
| TXT | kiap.com | 600 | v=spf1 redirect=_spf.yandex.net |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.