kf.expert
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #343,245
▼ 14,859
- Rank in TLD
- #14
－
- Referring Domains
- 235
▲ 6
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 22.8
- Subdomains
- 9
- Domain age
- —
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 22.8
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 20.7
- Referring Domains
- 235
- Linked Domains
- 24
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 74
10–19 42
20–29 43
30–39 34
40–49 18
50–59 14
60–69 6
70–79 3
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 235
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| yandex.ru | 90.3 | #47 |
| rambler.ru | 76.3 | #991 |
| rbc.ru | 75.7 | #1,129 |
| kommersant.ru | 70.4 | #3,124 |
| ya.ru | 69.5 | #3,725 |
| vedomosti.ru | 67.0 | #5,513 |
| tbank.ru | 65.9 | #6,534 |
| cian.ru | 64.1 | #8,670 |
| urlscan.io | 62.7 | #10,860 |
| fontanka.ru | 60.2 | #16,747 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .expert
No registration data could be retrieved.
Subdomain
ai.kf.expertcyprus-passport.kf.expertextpic.kf.expertextpic3.kf.expertextpic5.kf.expertmedia.kf.expertmoscowcity.kf.expertstreet.kf.expertwww.kf.expert
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | kf.expert | 600 | 185.65.149.211 |
| MX | kf.expert | 600 | 0 mail.nfgroup.ru |
| NS | kf.expert | 3600 | ns1.yandexcloud.net |
| NS | kf.expert | 3600 | ns2.yandexcloud.net |
| SOA | kf.expert | 3600 | ns1.yandexcloud.net. mx.cloud.yandex.net. 1 10800 900 604800 86400 |
| TXT | kf.expert | 600 | v=spf1ip4:188.170.0.0/24ip4:185.30.19.0/24a:mail.nfgroup.rua:webmail.nfgroup.ruinclude:spf.unisender.cominclude:spf.protection.outlook.com~all |
| TXT | kf.expert | 600 | 202006230803045ym47k8nkzbqfrbyxgcxrunqxl8777cx732hp2exudhou9gv4x |
| TXT | kf.expert | 600 | yandex-verification:4a2f8b4c826f0e9e |
| TXT | kf.expert | 600 | google-site-verification=kulX8qZWyrjjYBE_vxKLJKe-sphQJRDQzRkzJ4kmyLI |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.