key4biz.it
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high.
- Global Rank
- #44,757
▲ 711
- Rank in TLD
- #419
▲ 1
- Referring Domains
- 1,668
▲ 18
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.6
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 25 yr 4 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 27.7
- Referring Domains
- 1,668
- Linked Domains
- 3,242
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 138
10–19 375
20–29 408
30–39 293
40–49 206
50–59 128
60–69 78
70–79 27
80–89 13
90–100 2
Total 1,668
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| amazon.com | 90.8 | #40 |
| bit.ly | 88.4 | #67 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| wikimedia.org | 85.2 | #150 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| telegram.me | 84.0 | #190 |
| salesforce.com | 83.6 | #216 |
| harvard.edu | 83.6 | #218 |
| mail.ru | 83.1 | #245 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .itItaly
- Registration date
- 26 Jun 2001
- Last updated
- 24 Oct 2026
- Domain statuses
- ok / autoRenewPeriod
- Registry
- IIT - CNR
Subdomain
dev.key4biz.itwww.key4biz.it
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | key4biz.it | 1800 | 66.71.161.52 |
| MX | key4biz.it | 1800 | 10 key4biz-it.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | key4biz.it | 1800 | dns3.arubadns.net |
| NS | key4biz.it | 1800 | dns2.technorail.com |
| NS | key4biz.it | 1800 | dns.technorail.com |
| NS | key4biz.it | 1800 | dns4.arubadns.cz |
| SOA | key4biz.it | 1800 | dns.technorail.com. hostmaster.key4biz.it. 2026040802 86400 7200 2592000 3600 |
| TXT | key4biz.it | 1800 | google-site-verification=DqUHK8I51tTQeq85kokTHkDUYePrrYZuKAO7dwGFXW0 |
| TXT | key4biz.it | 1800 | v=spf1 include:musvc.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.