kalvarijosvb.lt
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #10,836,350
▼ 1,084,220
- Rank in TLD
- #12,305
▼ 1,136
- Referring Domains
- 15
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.4
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 14 yr 6 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 26.9
- Referring Domains
- 15
- Linked Domains
- 62
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 3
20–29 4
30–39 6
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 15
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| mukis.lt | 39.0 | #554,889 |
| labiblioteka.lt | 34.9 | #1,010,424 |
| azuolynobiblioteka.lt | 33.3 | #1,347,811 |
| rvb.lt | 33.0 | #1,407,038 |
| lbd.lt | 30.7 | #1,967,932 |
| bibliotekavisiems.lt | 30.0 | #2,219,585 |
| balttour.lv | 26.9 | #3,616,281 |
| trailmasters.lt | 24.7 | #4,965,154 |
| krsvbiblioteka.lt | 23.9 | #5,563,840 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ltLithuania
- Registration date
- 19 Apr 2012
- Expires
- 20 Apr 2027 (166 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- registered
- Registry
- Kaunas University of Technology
- Registrar
- UAB "Interneto vizija"
Subdomain
muziejus.kalvarijosvb.ltwww.kalvarijosvb.lt
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | kalvarijosvb.lt | 3600 | 79.98.25.20 |
| MX | kalvarijosvb.lt | 3600 | 10 kalvarijosvb.lt |
| NS | kalvarijosvb.lt | 86400 | ns3.serveriai.lt |
| NS | kalvarijosvb.lt | 86400 | ns1.serveriai.lt |
| NS | kalvarijosvb.lt | 86400 | ns2.serveriai.lt |
| NS | kalvarijosvb.lt | 86400 | ns4.serveriai.lt |
| SOA | kalvarijosvb.lt | 86400 | ns1.serveriai.lt. hostmaster.iv.lt. 2026092300 43200 3600 1209600 3600 |
| TXT | kalvarijosvb.lt | 3600 | v=spf1 a mx include:spf.serveriai.lt include:_spf.google.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.