jvm.bi
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #4,723,271
▲ 4,737,769
- Rank in TLD
- #87
▲ 70
- Referring Domains
- 10
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.9
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 4 yr 10 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 31.2
- Referring Domains
- 10
- Linked Domains
- 13
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 3
20–29 1
30–39 0
40–49 4
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 10
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| adc.de | 52.9 | #59,717 |
| gwa.de | 47.4 | #150,817 |
| gameswirtschaft.de | 46.9 | #163,584 |
| charactertype.com | 40.6 | #438,086 |
| incom.org | 40.1 | #474,254 |
| icon-papers.blog | 22.2 | #7,017,254 |
| brandb.net | 18.5 | #12,449,442 |
| jvm-bi.de | 11.0 | #34,587,810 |
| wagnerludwig.de | 10.8 | #35,599,630 |
| denizsahin.de | 9.0 | #46,128,755 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .biBurundi
- Registration date
- 5 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 3 Jan 2026
- Expires
- 5 Jan 2027 (61 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- Centre National de l'Informatique
- Registrar
- Key-Systems
Subdomain
www.jvm.biwww-static.jvm.bi
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | jvm.bi | 3600 | 46.30.213.10 |
| AAAA | jvm.bi | 3600 | 2a02:2350:5:10a:57:e80f:2422:1b8 |
| MX | jvm.bi | 10800 | 10 mx4.pub.mailpod11-cph3.one.com |
| MX | jvm.bi | 10800 | 10 mx3.pub.mailpod11-cph3.one.com |
| MX | jvm.bi | 10800 | 10 mx1.pub.mailpod11-cph3.one.com |
| MX | jvm.bi | 10800 | 10 mx2.pub.mailpod11-cph3.one.com |
| NS | jvm.bi | 14400 | ns01.one.com |
| NS | jvm.bi | 14400 | ns02.one.com |
| SOA | jvm.bi | 14400 | ns01.one.com. hostmaster.one.com. 2026102205 14400 3600 1209600 600 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.