jukf.org
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low.
- Global Rank
- #5,071,971
▼ 517,822
- Rank in TLD
- #409,270
▼ 38,523
- Referring Domains
- 22
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.6
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 16 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 34.2
- Referring Domains
- 22
- Linked Domains
- 170
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 3
10–19 4
20–29 3
30–39 3
40–49 7
50–59 2
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 22
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| nodai.ac.jp | 51.1 | #79,859 |
| teikyo-u.ac.jp | 50.7 | #86,459 |
| kyusan-u.ac.jp | 48.9 | #116,185 |
| komazawa-u.ac.jp | 48.7 | #119,655 |
| tais.ac.jp | 48.5 | #124,104 |
| daito.ac.jp | 47.6 | #143,599 |
| karatedo.co.jp | 45.5 | #205,695 |
| kokushikan.ac.jp | 44.5 | #241,977 |
| univas.jp | 41.3 | #394,496 |
| teikyo.jp | 38.6 | #589,244 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 24 May 2010
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 24 May 2030 (1,297 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.com
Subdomain
kantou.jukf.orgwww.jukf.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | jukf.org | 300 | 133.125.148.25 |
| MX | jukf.org | 300 | 0 jukf.org |
| NS | jukf.org | 86400 | 01.dnsv.jp |
| NS | jukf.org | 86400 | 02.dnsv.jp |
| NS | jukf.org | 86400 | 03.dnsv.jp |
| NS | jukf.org | 86400 | 04.dnsv.jp |
| SOA | jukf.org | 86400 | 01.dnsv.jp. hostmaster.dnsv.jp. 1781275161 3600 900 604800 300 |
| TXT | jukf.org | 300 | v=spf1 mx ip4:133.125.148.25 ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.