jsum.or.jp
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #495,825
▼ 14,696
- Rank in TLD
- #13,438
▲ 5
- Referring Domains
- 223
▲ 6
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.7
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 23 yr 3 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 23.5
- Referring Domains
- 223
- Linked Domains
- 351
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 29
10–19 64
20–29 47
30–39 17
40–49 25
50–59 25
60–69 11
70–79 3
80–89 2
90–100 0
Total 223
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| mdpi.com | 80.3 | #459 |
| mhlw.go.jp | 78.9 | #594 |
| mynavi.jp | 76.5 | #954 |
| jst.go.jp | 73.9 | #1,573 |
| umin.ac.jp | 67.6 | #5,063 |
| keio.ac.jp | 66.8 | #5,706 |
| osaka-u.ac.jp | 65.2 | #7,302 |
| tohoku.ac.jp | 64.6 | #7,944 |
| hokudai.ac.jp | 62.9 | #10,469 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .jpJapan
- Registration date
- 23 Jul 2003
- Last updated
- 31 Jul 2026
- Expires
- 31 Jul 2027 (268 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- Connected (2027/07/31)
- Registry
- Japan Registry Services Co., Ltd.
Subdomain
www.jsum.or.jpwww2.jsum.or.jp
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | jsum.or.jp | 3600 | 160.16.211.90 |
| MX | jsum.or.jp | 3600 | 10 jsum.sakura.ne.jp |
| NS | jsum.or.jp | 3600 | ns1.dns.ne.jp |
| NS | jsum.or.jp | 3600 | ns2.dns.ne.jp |
| SOA | jsum.or.jp | 3600 | master.dns.ne.jp. tech.sakura.ad.jp. 2026061601 3600 900 3600000 3600 |
| TXT | jsum.or.jp | 3600 | v=spf1 +ip4:160.16.211.90 +ip4:219.94.158.129 +ip4:59.106.19.199 +ip4:162.43.105.140 include:_spf.google.com ~all |
| TXT | jsum.or.jp | 3600 | google-site-verification=aG0wsU1jxjfgKC-f8Y6g8KlmmPo45-rFy3R-yMRLXhk |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.